Movie Reviews for The Hallelujah Trail

The Hallelujah Trail

The Hallelujah Trail List Price: $14.98
Our Price: $5.90
You Save: $9.08 (61%)
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Buy Used: from $4.00 (click here)
Category: DVD
See more DVD releases


(Click here)
Buy this DVD movie at online store in your country
Canada

Movie Reviews of The Hallelujah Trail

Movie Review: Good Flick!
Summary: 4 Stars

This was an entertaining film, epecially the performances of Burt Lancaster, Lee Remick, the "Good Republican"....Brian Keith, and Robert Wilke. Though none of these fine actors are generally known for their comedic talents, they pull off this whiskey tale in style!

Movie Review: enjoyable comic western
Summary: 4 Stars

A humorous look at the wild west where the temperance ladies cause more uproar than the liquor seeking Indians or the greedy mining community leaders with Burt Lancaster, the fort commander, trying to keep peace. Good fun.

Movie Review: The Hallelujah Trail
Summary: 4 Stars

We originally owned a VHS copy which no longer works and so we need a replacement and also we enjoy old movies ,

Movie Review: Nice try - but no cigar as the saying goes
Summary: 3 Stars

From the 'BIGGER IS BETTER' school of film-making that was in vogue in the mid-sixties comes this so-so comedy/western. Beginning with "It's A Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World" in 1964 movie comedies took on the form and approach of an epic. Immediately on it's heels followed Blake Edwards's "The Great Race", Ken Annakin's "Those Magnificent Men In Their Flying Machines" and this film. This trend continued and lasted for five years, culminating in Annakin's 1969 second mammoth effort "Those Daring Young Men In Their Jaunty Jalopies". But movie audiences had lost their appreciation for the formula by the time it appeared - the caper film was the newest rage and the slew of disaster films was only lurking around the corner ready to take up the rest of the slack! "It's A Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World" has gone on to enjoy bona-fide cult classic status and is still highly regarded and well-loved by its many defenders. The others all have their defenders as well and rightly so where Edwards's "The Great Race" is concerned, definitely a classic in it's own right. And over forty years later many others within this sub-genre continue to delight and entertain young audiences today and that is a success that doesn't show any signs of diminishing.

In 1965 director John Sturges could have made any movie he wanted to. He was fresh from the success of back-to-back international sensations "The Magnificent Seven" and "The Great Escape"; mysteriously he picked this project (he would never again direct another comedy). Burt Lancaster was in a similar position, owning his own production company and undeniably a firmly established star of the screen. He agreed to star in this film, reuniting him Sturges with whom he had done the immensely entertaining and hugely successful "Gunfight At The O.K. Corral" back in 1957. I'm sure they were both counting on nothing but the best when they set out to make this picture. Well, you know what they say about good intentions...

What must have looked like fun on paper doesn't quite make it completely to the screen here. Right at the point the comedy should be peaking it falls flat and only rarely recovers. Many of the sight gags, slapstick routines, one-liners and snappy comebacks drop dead on arrival. This is not the fault of a great and very capable cast though; everyone put forth their best foot here in a solid effort to pull this off. The two major liabilities here: a director that didn't understand comedy and the film's mammoth length. Sturges, who had never had any experience in working with comedy, was probably unsuited to direct this film and that is painfully evident throughout. In hindsight it would have been wise to have an assistant director with experience in this field of movie-making. The script itself is stretched to the point of no return and should have been trimmed and tightened up. At 165 minutes it's just too long to sustain the singular idea.

If you're not familiar with the film here's the story: The town of Denver is nearing a crisis with winter nearly upon them - there's only a few bottles of whiskey left. A shipment is on the way to Denver but the odds against it making it to them are great. Several tribes of Indians want to liberate some (or most) of the shipment themselves; a ladies temperance union wants to prevent the shipment entirely and runs interference with the military men assigned to protect it. The Irish teamsters who are the wagon drivers for the shipment threaten to strike in order to procure as much of the whiskey for themselves as possible. None of this sits well with the Denver miners who decide to form their own citizens' militia and meet the shipment to bring it safely home. The groups all converge on one another during a sandstorm resulting in a bit of chaos. Afterwards the commander of the military assumes charge of the situation; he works to resolve the teamsters threat to strike, gains the respect of the Denver citizens' militia, continues verbal battles with the ladies and brokers a deal with the Indians that is misunderstood or misinterpreted - you'll have to watch to decide for yourself. Later on the Indians surprise the military, disarm them and take the women hostage - demanding the whiskey as ransom. Eventually one side wins out...or so it seems. Again you'll have to watch to see what I mean.

All the usual cultural stereotypes are in place here: Irish teamsters thirsting for whiskey, Indians desperate for 'crazy water', women urging the men to practice temperance, etc. The cast tries to get the best out of this but the overall result is only middling. Donald Pleasance as Oracle Jones and Lee Remick as Cora Templeton Massingale fare the best; Martin Landau as Chief-Walks-Stooped-Over is an embarrassment to see in this day and age (why couldn't they have cast an Indian actor in this role?) and Lancaster himself seems to appear as if working under a great strain in some scenes - I can't be sure if this is part of the character he is playing or not. A definite mixed bag, "The Hallelujah Trail" was poorly received in 1965 and time hasn't been kind to it either. It plays better on TV when broken up by commercials which is how I first saw it.

The best bit in the movie: When Remick is trying vainly to convince Lancaster about the dangers of alcohol she reports to him that "Three of the women in my movement have lost their husbands to alcohol. The men literally drank themselves to death!" Burt's snappy reply? "One can only wonder why." There are other gems like this scattered throughout that are worth hearing.






Movie Review: Not very funny - but easy watching
Summary: 3 Stars

This isn't that bad a film. It's just not particularly funny. I guess the big problem is that there aren't any comic actors in there to help cover up the deficiencies of the script (like say, It's A Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World, which has an equally unfunny script but makes up for it with funny performers). Burt Lancaster is fine - I like the gentle send-up of his macho roles. And Robert Wilkie and Martin Landau don't do a bad job as the principal indians. Donald Pleasance starts off well as the drunken "oracle" who only sees visions when he's boozed, but the writers don't seem to know what to do with him once the action gets going. Brian Keith is wasted, as is Pamela Tiffin (how the heck she got into the starring credits with only five or so minutes of screen time is beyond me) and Lee Remick is just plain annoying. The big comic set-pieces (the battle in the sandstorm and the final wagon chase) are a complete mess - you get the impression that the team made it up as they went along. On the plus side is a wonderfully dry voice-over from John Dehner, stunning wide-screen photography and one of Elmer Bernstein's best music scores (not up there with The Great Escape or The Magnificent Seven but miles ahead of a lot of his other stuff). John Sturges doesn't so much direct as simply aim the camera and let the actors do their thing. All this being said, I still don't mind the movie. It has that special kind of appealing naivety that those big budget comedies had in the sixties, and if you're from that generation it'll strike a nice, easy-going note. But a great comedy it ain't. More like a pleasant inoffensive time filler.
More Movie Reviews:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Compare prices and read customer reviews for more than one million DVD titles.
Oscar 2005 Winners