 |
Swimming Pool (Unrated Version) by François Ozon
Buy this DVD movie at online store in your country
Canada
DVD Cover InformationActor: Charles Dance, Charlotte Rampling, Jean-Marie Lamour, Ludivine Sagnier, Marc Fayolle Director: François Ozon Brand: UNI DIST CORP. (MCA) Writer: François Ozon Producer: Christine De Jekel Producer: Marc Missonnier Producer: Olivier Delbosc Producer: Timothy Burrill Writer: Emmanuèle Bernheim Writer: Sionann O'Neill DVD: Region Code 1 Audio: Spanish (Subtitled); French (Subtitled); English (Original Language), Dolby Digital 5.1; French (Original Language), Dolby Digital 5.1; French (Dubbed), Dolby Digital 5.1 Format: AC-3, Anamorphic, Color, Dolby, DTS Surround Sound, Dubbed, DVD, NTSC, Subtitled, Widescreen Picture Format: 1.85:1 Running Time: 102 minutes DVD Release Date: 2005-08-23 Audience Rating: Unrated Studio: Universal Studios
Movie Reviews of Swimming Pool (Unrated Version)Movie Review: Purely Symbolism Summary: 5 Stars
SWIMMING POOL : AN ANALYSIS by Alan C. Shaw Ph. D.
This was an excellent movie only if you're willing to work through the symbolism, rather than have things handed to you as in normal cinematic fare. I do believe it made sense, even the ending, but like I said, you have to work for it.
Sarah is a woman struggling with a dark past of sexual abuse by her father. The experience began at the age of 13 and has clouded everything in her life and affected all of her relationships, and she works through it through her writing. The abuse destroyed her ability to have healthy relationships with men and women and turned her into a repressed recluse. You can see this from the very beginning when she doesn't want to deal with people in the real world of the subway train. In fact, it seems she feels that something inside of her was murdered by the abuse, and she feels unclear about who to blame. So her stories are all about murder mysteries. Solving this type of crime becomes her passion.
With this as the backdrop, the movie's plot makes sense. By writing her books she has been trying to escape her misery and somehow resolve a crime that has destroyed her life. But her publisher doesn't get it. He sees the murder mysteries as a good thing in and of themselves because they are making money for him, not as a means to an end as she sees it. The publisher is also having a sexual relationship with her and so she connects him with her father--as she does all men who have sex with her. So, of course, when he mentioned he has a daughter she identifies with this daughter and ultimately gets fixated on her. Sarah's sexual relationship with the publisher inspires her to write because it connects her to the issues with her father, which expresses itself as a murder mystery in her stories. So she goes to his French home expecting to have sex with him again and write another novel.
At first it's business as usual, and she is starting to make progress. But then something very different begins to unfold. John, the publisher, doesn't come and instead Sarah is forced to confront "Julie." Since she gets the daughter's name slightly wrong as "Julie" instead of the correct name of "Julia," we are being told that Julie is not real, but only a person imagined by Sarah. Earlier, the publisher had mentioned that he might not be coming because of his daughter, and then when the daughter as "Julie" surprises Sarah by showing up unannounced one night, we find ourselves digging deeper into Sarah's traumatic issues. Julie tells Sarah that Sarah has the good room because it has the view of the swimming pool, and the pool comes into the story as a construct representing a collection of issues in Sarah's mind.
Julie swims in the pool beneath the surface and encourages Sarah to do the same, but Sarah thinks it's full of filth, and indeed the pool is dirty. Yet Sarah is clearly intrigued by the pool and by the expressive sexuality of Julie which are clearly connected issues. Even though she is intrigued, Sarah does not go into the pool herself until it is cleared up by the work of Marcel. Marcel has a funny relationship with Julie, since Julie referred to him as her father, and so his connection to the pool and to cleaning up the issues that need to be resolved becomes progressively clearer.
But first we must probe deeper into that pool of issues and what do we find? When she first arrived at the chateau she found the egg-shaped urn (it can't just be a vase), so we begin to see a theme of death and birth. The ashes of the urn likely symbolize the death of her old self and the egg involves the birth of her new self, and there is some tension between the two. This is played out through the tension seen constantly between Julie and Sarah. Over the bed Sarah finds a cross which she immediately takes down because sex does not represent something sacred to her, but something defiled. To Sarah, Julie's freeness with sex means she is also defiled. That is why Julie's sex life is so debased, even causing Julie to get bruised. Julie is Sarah as a child, abused at 13, unable to embrace love at 16. The c-section scar on Julie fits into this tension if it suggest that the repressed Sarah was artificially born out of the unrepressed Julie. A cut was made between the old and the new Sarah and a scar representing a torn reality is left behind.
Facing her younger self, Sarah tries to imagine how her mother would disapprove of Julie's sexual activity, and she expresses this to Julie. And later in the story Julie believes Sarah to be her long lost mother. But Julie collapses when Sarah denies the mother, because the relationship with the mother has been lost in the horror of sexual abuse from the father. The mother is missing from this story and finding the mother and reuniting with her is part of Julie's quest. That is why the dwarf appeared who represented both the wife and the daughter of Marcel who himself represents the father. We know Marcel is a representation of the father because of what Julie said about this and because he later has sex with Sarah in Julie's room. The dwarf has a confused relationship with Marcel. At first she is his wife and then his daughter. In fact, she is half of both, wife and daughter, and it is appropriate because the movie is about what happened when that line was crossed in a sexual relationship between a father and daughter. As the terrified daughter, she tells Sarah that the mother was not murdered. But the fear in the Dwarf's eyes makes it clear that she is afraid that maybe the mother was murdered. This guilt seems to indicate that after the abuse from the father, Sarah worried that maybe she was responsible through leading him on by being promiscuous. As mentioned before, Julie's promiscuity personifies this guilt. This is what has driven her to become repressed, afraid of the implications of her interest in sexual fulfillment. When the dwarf refers to the car wreck she is referring to the sexual abuse that has killed the relationship with the mother and gave Julie/Sarah her scarred life. Sarah has been trying to determine who was responsible through her many books about murder mysteries and now the mystery of the death of Frank gives her another chance to try to resolve the issue.
Julie is a self-aware construction of Sarah's mind, because she has read what Sarah has written about her. So Julie knows what Sarah needs her to do. She goes and finds Frank, and sets him up to be in between the two of them. Thus, they play out the tension that existed between the father, the mother and the daughter. And at some point the mother figure retires and the interest between Frank and the daughter plays itself out. Daughters often have crushes on their fathers, so Julie's attempts to seduce him aren't really the issue. The issue is that Frank does respond, and he responds right in the middle of the pool. Right in the center of Sarah's mental struggle, the pool of her mind. There she finds Frank, yet another father figure sexually involved with the promiscuous daughter. And Sarah must stop it somehow, so she throws a rock to interrupt what is happening. It works, but Julie knows better than Sarah that she cannot let Frank off the hook. For the sake of the book (which represents Sarah's attempt to resolve her trauma) Julie must play this out.
Julie/Sarah wanted the father to want her more than he wanted the mother, but Frank, as the father, ultimately wanted the mother more. Julie's jealously leads her to kill him, but what does that death of this father figure ultimately mean? It is up to Sarah to find out by trying to uncover once and for all what is really going on inside of Julie. This leads Sarah to investigate the murder, but in the end she resolves it by going to Julie and asking her to tell her what happened. Julie does and reveals that she killed him to help Sarah finish the book. Sarah writes about murders, and she needs a murder to ultimately finish the book that takes a deeper look into her consciousness, into the depths of the pool of her mind. Since it is possible that the book might resolve the guilt Sarah feels, Julie knows that she must murder off the father in the hopes of perhaps bringing back a relationship with the mother. The father was the one who was wrong, not her, and so by killing him she proves her loyalty to the mother.
After this realization the tension is gone between Sarah and Julie. Together they bury the body and end the rift. When Marcel appears to be about to dig it up, she brings him back to room of Julie and offers herself to him once more. But this time she does not appear serious about him, almost like she is not afraid of this memory anymore. He no longer has power over her. Next, Julie is no longer needed and so she leaves. But she sends a letter essentially saying the book can now be shared that brings the mother back into her life. Having the story of her mother back in her life allows her to be in touch with the emotions that she has so long repressed and now she can become a more profound writer. She can now bare her soul without shame and in doing so she can finally write her best work.
But father figures in her life like John who have had sex with her would never let her bare her soul and tell her story. They want her to stay repressed. Knowing this, she breaks free from John and returns only to show him the book that has put an end to their relationship. And when she sees the real Julia while doing this, someone she had never met, she has the triumphant image of the mothers and the daughters reconciled in spite of abusive fathers. She sees herself waving to the real Julia, who after all was the idea that sparked her breakthrough. Then she sees herself as the child Julie waving to herself as the mother in the red dress she found earlier. The "red dress" could represent the "redress" of
Summary of Swimming Pool (Unrated Version)A MURDER-MYSTERY AUTHOR'S SEARCH FOR INSPIRATION TAKES A WICKED TURN WHEN SHE MEETS A SEXY AND PROVOCATIVE YOUNG WOMAN WITH ANEXPLOSIVE PAST. In terms of alluring female nudity, Swimming Pool shows a lot, but it's what remains concealed that gives this erotic thriller a potent, voyeuristic charge. With his Hitchcockian handling of secrets and lies, prolific French director François Ozon reunites with his Under the Sand star, Charlotte Rampling, to tell a seductive tale of murder and complicity, beginning when British mystery novelist Sarah Morton (Rampling) seeks peace and relaxation at her publisher's French villa, only to find his brash, sexually liberated daughter Julie (Ludivine Sagnier) arriving shortly thereafter to disrupt her solitary reverie. What begins as mutual annoyance turns into something more sinister and duplicitous, alternating between Julie's predatory sex with men and Sarah's observant, perhaps jealous fascination. These two women, generations apart, share in Ozon's delicate dance of trust, curiosity, and gradual understanding, until a twist ending that forces you to reevaluate everything you've seen. Only then will the mysteries of Swimming Pool be fully and tantalizingly revealed. (Note: The unrated version contains full-frontal nudity that's been edited from the rated version. In both versions, the overall plot is not affected.) --Jeff Shannon
|
 |