 |
Buy this DVD movie at online store in your country
Canada
Movie Reviews of Roger DodgerMovie Review: The Artful Roger Summary: 4 Stars
Roger Swanson is a coldhearted, fast-talking yuppie businessman who has cynically reduced the man-woman equation to its Darwinian essentials. To Roger, women are objects to be conquered not people to be respected, and he has learned to employ his good looks, charm and over-analytical mind in the service of getting laid. When Nick, his naïve, inexperienced 16-year old nephew comes to town, Roger decides to train the boy in the fine art of manipulation and seduction, taking him out for a night on the town that the youngster will not soon forget. As conceived by first time writer/director Dylan Kidd, "Roger Dodger" is less a full-fledged narrative and more a series of extended conversations. And I, for one, couldn't be happier, for the dialogue Kidd has come up with is sharp, observant, insightful and witty, as Roger opens up and reveals his unique perspective on the dating scene. He uses his mouth like a machine gun, shooting rounds of rapid-fire, staccato comments, indifferent to who's left standing when he's done. He really has no qualms about "corrupting" his underage nephew, never seeing or caring about the corrosive effect he may be having on him. In the process, we learn quite a bit about Roger as a person, most especially the aloofness he feels from others and his inability to make any kind of emotional connection that really works. Long estranged from his father and sister, Roger is also facing a breakup with the older woman he's recently come to fancy (his boss in fact). Roger is a humorous figure but also an immensely sad one, for he really does seem - for all his bravado and bluster to the contrary - to be a lonely, unhappy guy. We are simultaneously drawn to him by his confidence and charisma and repelled by his smarminess and coldness, just like the characters in the film. As Roger, Campbell Scott does a superb job bringing out both of those seemingly contradictory qualities. A non-stop talker, Roger knows how to draw all the attention in the room to himself; he is (at the risk of mixing my metaphors here) like a chattering vortex up there on the screen and we can't help but be sucked in by his personality and presence. No wonder Scott won the 2002 award for Best Actor from the National Board of Review. In fact, I haven't seen a performance this smooth, alive and energetic in a very long time. Equally impressive is young Jesse Eisenberg whose wide-eyed innocence and youthful decency provide an effective counterpoint to the brash but empty Roger. Isabella Rossellini, Elizabeth Berkley and Jennifer Beals also turn in outstanding performances as the various ladies who play a part in the two men's adventure. In his debut film, Kidd shows himself to be in full control of his medium. He employs a jittery, handheld camera in almost every scene, a technique that may bother some people but which heightens the sense of realism so essential to the nature of the story. In this way, the audience is made to feel almost like an eavesdropper on the various conversations. Kidd should also be commended - in this day of maximum special effects and minimal verbiage - for allowing his characters to speak at great length on any number of topics. Many another filmmaker would have felt intimidated by such a heavy reliance on dialogue. Kidd, obviously, feels intoxicated by the beauty of language and his intoxication becomes ours. Roger is a fascinating case study mainly because we feel so ambivalent in our attitude towards him. Just as we are about to consign him to the category of heartless, cold-blooded bastard, he wins us over by showing us that barest glimmer of humanity that peeks out every so often from beneath his well-oiled exterior. "Roger Dodger" is not only an intriguing, amusing and poignant tale of realtionships and sex in the modern world, but a confident first film that augurs well for its gifted young maker.
Movie Review: Roger is cynical but also mysteriously charming Summary: 4 Stars
Quentin Tarantino is the most recent director who taught us the importance of a good opening scene for a movie, through classics such as Reservoir Dogs and Pulp Fiction.Dylan Kidd appears to be a very capable student, opening his directorial debut, titled Roger Dodger, with a remarkable scene, a dialogue that actually turns into a monologue of our lead character. In that scene, Roger (Campbell Scott), a successful advertiser and probably equally successful womanizer, states why, according to his beliefs, men will become totally unnecessary for women in the very near future. After such a strong intro, it is a challenge for every director to keep the attention of the viewer at the same level for the rest of the way. Still, Kidd seems to be up to the task, giving us a really absorbing movie. Be warned though: Roger Dodger is a dialogue driven movie. There is not much action here. The film gets started when Roger's nephew (Jesse Eisenberg) suddenly visits, and asks Roger to tell him about the secrets of love - or, if you prefer, to help him get his first sexual experience. Roger will accept the challenge, promising a "fail safe" method, and a long night will begin. Their ride includes a visit to a bar where two attractive but also willing to talk women (Elizabeth Berkley, Jennifer Beals) are added to their company, an (uninvited) visit to a party by Roger's employer and ex-girlfriend (Isabella Rossellini), who has made perfectly clear that she does not want to socialize with him any more, and a final surprise visit, where the climax of the film is set. Most of the film's dialogues regard sex and the relations between men and women. Roger's philosophy in advertising is to humiliate people, make them feel bad about themselves, and then offer some kind of product to "cure" their unhappiness. In real life, his philosophy is not much different. At least in the first half. Being totally cynical, he won't hesitate to degrade others not taking into consideration their feelings. In some cases, this tactic will give him an advantage, allowing him to find others unprepared and manipulate their weaknesses. In other cases though, things are not that sunny... On the other hand, his nephew, probably because he is still young and inexperienced in life, expresses views that are much more honest and romantic. This, has Roger, his presumable mentor, waiting on the sidelines, not being able to do much. Campbell Scott, who plays Roger, is absolutely convincing. He says all his lines without trying too much. He also shows a considerable amount of charm, which makes him likable, even if we know that this in not the correct reaction toward a character like his. From the supporting roles, only Elizabeth Berkley (Saved by the bell if I remember correctly) is not totally up to the rest cast's high standards, having a tendency to goggle her eyes way too often. Kidd's direction is live, with a penetrating camera that is in constant motion, like the eyes of its main character. That would probably tire a few viewers, but in my humble opinion, fits perfectly with the film's atmosphere. If we would like to locate weaknesses in Roger Dodger, those have nothing to do with the views of our main character. As a matter of fact, Kidd comments indirectly about them, by giving us a glimpse of Roger's personal life. The problem is that the film is concentrated too much on the dialogue, not giving much of a chance to its characters to develop satisfactorily as complete human beings. And that is the case even for Roger. We get to hear a few things about his family, which, if further analyzed, would probably explain his behavior. Still, all those references are left there hanging. And that's a pity. In any case, we forgive Roger because he managed to win us from the opening minute!
Movie Review: On the prowl.... Summary: 4 Stars
.... with Roger Dodger is like spending a night with a "player": you feel slimed, angered, bewildered, and entertained, at the same time. By the end of the film, you want to take a shower and crawl into bed to get some rest.The Roger of the title is a womanizing scumball brainiac whose speech is as highly controlled as his love life is absolutely out of control. This shark loves the ladies, to a fault; by mentally assassinating them before making any kind of move, he ruins his chances continuously. You can see this routine might of work with younger, unsuspecting college girls, but as Roger is aging, the act is failing. Ironically, his nephew shows up to seek advice about the ladies, so Roger spends most of the film poisioning this young lad's mind about the ways of the love world, possibly validating the claim: "Those who can't anymore, teach." Roger is expertly played by Campbell Scott, a highly undervalued actor in cinema today. He walks the fine line between making Roger just scumbag enough to abhor him, and brings a remarkable vulnerability to him at the right times. Equally compelling is Jennifer Beals as a temporary seductress to nephew Nick, and yes, Elizabeth Berkley shines (it's time we get over Showgirls). The successful script, combined with the great cast, make for a great movie experience. One problem I have is with the overuse of the "shaky camera", which the filmmakers immediately defend in their commentary and bonus features tracks. When I first saw "Roger Dodger" in the theater, I almost felt, fearing motion sickness with the shaky cam. But soon, I fell into it and didn't notice it as much. At home, the reaction is similiar, but somehow, more jarring. Some scenes are almost unwatchable with the shakiness. I appreciate the reason why they chose that method, but find it to take away from the impact of some scenes. "Shaky cam" is okay, but sometimes, this is "earthquake cam". Overall, Roger Dodger carries well. As secrets are revealed at the end, and the real truth comes out, it somehow seems right. Kudos for this bravera film, and looking for more from this cinematic team in the future.
Movie Review: Great character study, excellent acting Summary: 4 Stars
The fast-paced, talky, intelligent "Roger Dodger" will prove to be a delight for some viewers. Others may find it abrasive and more than a little offensive. Whatever one's viewpoint, it's hard to deny that Roger Swanson is one memorable character. Roger [Campbell Scott] is a very successful writer at a New York advertising agency. As he puts is, his job is to get people buy things by making them feel bad about themselves. Shrew, fast-talking Roger long ago learned to use the same technique on women. When he meets one he wants, he sizes her up, then begins to say things designed to make her feel that her life needs something. That something is Roger. The bulk of the movie takes place over the course of a day and a night when Roger's manipulative, self-centered world begins to crumble. His latest conquest [Isabella Rossellini], who is also his boss, unceremoniously dumps him in a hilarious scene which shows the great inroads women have made in what used to be exclusively male territory. Then Nick [Jesse Eisenberg], the 16-year old son of his estranged sister in Ohio, shows up. An unexpected bond develops between the two, and soon Roger begins to show the eager lad his technique for getting women. What follows is a series of escapades in which both guys, for better or worse, gets far more than he bargains for. Though the movie takes place in a big city, guys like Roger exist everywhere, and we've all met at least one of them. They are frequently well educated and materially successful, but emotionally they are stuck in their teens. No wonder Roger bonds with Nick. Their maturity levels are about the same. The underrated Scott gives perhaps his best performance to date as pathetic Roger. Eisenberg is touching as the sensitive Nick. The entire supporting cast, which includes Rossellini, Jennifer Beals and Elizabeth Berkley, does a fine job. "Roger Dodger" is a low budget movie. It suffers from some rather shaky hand-held camera work. Despite its technical flaws, it is a highly entertaining character study.
Movie Review: Surprising and unconventionally charming Summary: 4 Stars
When people grab your arm and say "You gotta see this movie!" it usually means I will hate it. After the smartly written opening scene though, I was pleasantly surprised and I was on board for the rest of the film. At the risk of contradicting myself, I normally don't like dialouge driven independent film, particularly set in an urban setting such as Manhattan. Nothing against NYC, it's just they tend to confuse pontification and philosophy as substance for character. However the writer/director manages to get his ideas across with out preaching, making for a highly watchable film. There is a slight pretension to this movie, but only because it is encapsulated in the main character, Roger, played brilliantly by Campbell Scott. I've always liked watching Scott and he does not dissappoint. He gives a performance that will hopefully get him noticed again. And it's balanced wonderfully by Jesse Eisenberg, who plays his nephew that looks to Roger to educate him in manners of the opposite sex. The other thing that I liked about this film is the pace. This is "A Night in the Life" premise but it moves quickly and you really don't realize your watching that type of movie until after it's over. The hook that keeps you watching is not only Scotts performance, but wondering if the nephew is going to lose his virginity. The only critizism I have of the film is that it's shot entirely hand held. The style lends itself well to the film, but I would love to see what this director does with a steadycam. You don't "Gotta see this movie!" but it's an intellegent distraction with a unique charm. And a great film for those who like New York stories. A good addition to a library.
More Movie Reviews: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
|
 |