Italian for Beginners
|
Our Price: $16.82 Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days Buy Used: from $3.31 (click here) Category: DVD See more DVD releases |
|---|
Canada
Movie Reviews of Italian for Beginners
Movie Review: Filmmaking for Beginners
Summary: 3 Stars
This is my first Dogme 95 film, so I guess that tells you that I don't get around much anymore (or at least get out to the movies as much as I'd like). Apparently, the movement--with its emphasis on natural lighting, hand held cameras and an avoidance of other cinematic conventions that make for slick cinema--has any number of detractors (and only a few ardent supporters). After viewing this film, I can see why.ITALIAN FOR BEGINNERS has a lot going for it. The cast is attractive and talented. The script is solid--the dialog natural, the plot a bit rambling and contrived in spots but certainly plausible. The film addresses weighty themes (love and death, the weightiest of all) without becoming Nordically depressive. It has a lightness of touch that is, from all that I've read about Dogme, pretty unusual for the genre.
Called me spoiled, but I miss good cinematography. Proponents of this apparent Dogme-tic rough, unpolished look will probably justify the movie's primitive quality as "honest" or "authentic." I just think it looks like TV, low budget TV at that. I notice one reviewer here referred to the film as a soap opera, and while he may have been talking plotline (and maybe it is a little on the soapy side, though not egregiously), he might just as well have been talking visuals.
Or you might compare it to an old Andy Warhol flick, one of those "artlessness as art" Paul Morrissey vehicles. But those were supposed to be campy and trashy and offbeat. Here the low tech look effectively undercuts the film's warmth and vibrancy. The actors and the script deserve a bit better.
Movie Review: Dialogue heavy
Summary: 3 Stars
This Danish DVD runs 97mins and contains English subtitles as well as captions for the hearing imparied. There are five theatrical trailers including Amelie, Birthday Girl, In the Bedroom, The Shipping News, and The Son's Room.
This movie is dialogue heavy which means you will be doing a lot of subtitle scanning. For me this is not an issue, except that I could not get into the movie. So reading the dialogue became a chore. A nice little retreat from the mainstream if only this movie hits the spot for you.
Movie Review: I don't think i watched the same movie...
Summary: 2 Stars
... as the back of the case claims it to be. I am a big fan of foreign films and own a lot of them, so at a cheap price of $5 i picked up this title. I didn't really read up on it (like i should have) but figured it would be good for something. It sadly really wasn't. The back of the case (description) claims this movie to be a "heart-warming romantic comedy" and i didn't think it was either of those things. And i know romance or comedy or romantic comedy when i see it - and i just didn't think it excelled in either. I hate to be so negative on a movie (not film, mind you - the "Dogma 95, shot-on-8mm" is actually kinda lame) but i was disappointed. As another reviewer said "I miss REAL cinematography". The acting was nothing special, and i actually didn't really get into the characters at all - the restaurant owner/second Italian teacher guy was really annoying and a jerk, but i liked the relationship between the Italian girl and Jorgenson(?) - it reminded me of the Portuguese girl's story in "Love Actually (Widescreen Edition)" (which is a much better film). Also, if one has read the description, they are led to believe that most of the movie (or at least the parts where they "discover passion and love") takes place in Italy, when they are actually only in Italy for about 10 minutes at the end. Sadly, i found i laughed only once, and found nothing passionate, sexy or comedic for the most part. Rent if you are that interested, otherwise look elsewhere for either foreign language films or romantic comedies.Movie Review: Watching Paint Dry for Beginners
Summary: 1 Stars
Back in the early `90s, when I was tooling about making home movies as a lark, and NEVER taking any of it seriously, I had NO idea that I had actually stumbled upon a method of filmmaking that very soon would be touted as THE method of the true, bona fide "auteur" (or, more accurately according to the tenets of the "method" used in this film, the "ANTI-auteur"), and that one day I would be watching "Italian for Beginners," directed by (well, credit for the directing cannot be given, as it would be against the "rules," which I will get to in a moment) and filmed in much the same-- in fact, the EXACT same-- style that I had employed back in what I now know were MY "auteur" (excuse me; my "ANTI-auteur") days. But having watched this film, the evidence is irrefutable; I know, because I've just finished watching the movies I shot back then with my trusty camcorder to get a comparison. And all I can say now is: "STAND ASIDE AND GIVE ME ROOM-- I'M ON MY WAY TO SUNDANCE!"In 1995, Danish filmmakers Lars Von Trier and Thomas Vinterberg developed a new (?) filmmaking technique, for which they co-wrote a back-to-basics guide entitled "Dogma 95," a manifesto for filmmakers who, by adhering to the rules set forth in the text, would become a part of the "newest" new wave to hit the industry, subsequently referred to as the "Cinema of Poverty," and with good reason.
If you're thinking of giving this film a go, before you watch it you MUST know something about Dogma 95 to have a chance in the hot place of making it through to the end. There are ten "rules" set forth in the manifesto, as well as an addendum, a handful of items tacked on (afterthoughts?), such as "I am no longer an artist" (which after watching this film I fully understand and agree with). But the main things (rules) you must know going in are these: The movie must be filmed on location, with only a hand-held camera and using only whatever light is naturally available. And "music must not be used unless it occurs where the scene is being shot." (Somewhat contradictorily, two of Von Trier's subsequent films were musicals; his disclaimer: "The rules are not meant to `limit' creativity, but to `spur it on'). Rule #10 states: "The director must not be credited." In retrospect, the wisdom of THIS rule is beyond reproach.
There IS some substance to this story, imbued as it is with elements of classic Bergman as it examines "loss" on a number of levels through the lives of a small, diverse group of individuals in various stages of disenfranchisement. Their common denominator is the class in, well...Italian for beginners, to which they seemingly gravitate, each with their own specific reasons and motivations. The class becomes a kind of focal point for them; it is here that relationships are formed or honed, and their lives begin to intersect. Now, had only Bergman been on hand to direct them.
These are everyday folks, just going about the business of living; and quite frankly, they aren't all that interesting, nor are their respective stories. The group includes Hal-Finn (Lars Kaalund), an obnoxious restaurant employee who hasn't as yet caught on to the "customer/employee" dynamic-- he's self-absorbed, rude and insufferable; Jorgen (Peter Gantzler) lacks self confidence; Karen (Ann Eleonora Jorgensen) a hairdresser who never seems to be able to finish a client (Hal-Finn is in her chair at least three times, but never gets past the hair-wetting phase before some crisis or other calls Karen away, sending poor Hal-Finn away each time with a wet head and no haircut); Olympia (Anette Stovelbaek) who works in a bakery, where no doubt she sells danish (pun intended; I have nothing to lose at this point); and Andreas (Anders W. Berthelsen), a pastor who has taken a temporary assignment six months after the death of his wife. But listening to the thoughts (and I intentionally do not use the term "ideas" here) of a randomly selected group of postal employees on the dock at 3 a.m. at the post office would be intrinsically more interesting than anything that occurs in this film. Berthelsen, especially, spends the entire movie looking confused, like he's a contestant on Jeopardy! but can't figure out why Alex keeps giving him the answers instead of the questions. Or maybe he's just trying to understand what he's doing in this film to begin with. Where, oh where, is Ingmar when you need him?
On a positive note, the performances here are for the most part quite natural, if not engaging. Kaalund, at least, makes a lasting impression with a character reminiscent of Rutger Hauer's Eric Vonk in "Turkish Delight" (aka "Turk's Fruit"), from 1973; perhaps that's why Hal-Finn is always getting in "Dutch" with his boss (again, pun intended).
The supporting cast includes Sara Indrio Jensen (Giulia), Jesper Christensen (Olympia's Father), Lene Tiemroth (Karen's Mother) and Carlo Barsotti (Marcello). There are those who are going to like, even applaud, this film; personally, I'd rather watch paint dry. To connect with this film one has to be able to embrace, or at least get beyond, the whole Dogma 95 thing. I couldn't. Okay, perhaps I just don't "get" it; to this day I still don't get the Andy Warhol "soup can" deal, either. Just know that "Italian for Beginners" is definitely NOT going to be for everyone. I do find it interesting that the "rules" are also referred to as the filmmakers "Vows of chastity," and that in reviews of Dogma 95 films the terms "chaste," "austere" and "pure" always seem to surface. In the great scheme of things I know it means something; what it is, I don't know. But bear in mind that the manifesto also states, "Furthermore I swear as a director to refrain from personal taste!" And with that, I rest my case.
Movie Review: Does Not Look or Move Like Film Should
Summary: 1 Stars
Hubby and I did not make it all the way through this film. We just hated the way it looked and the pace it moved at from frame #1. We packed it in early on and were glad we only rented it. It looks as if it were shot by someone first using a home video camera the day after unpacking it from the underneath the Christmas tree. It looks nothing like its beautiful cover on the box. I am thus in shock that this film just scored slot #7 on "Time" Magazine's Top 10 Films of 2002. Amazon customer/reviewer Tom Reynolds made it all the way through, hating every frame, and likened it to watching paint dry. I urge you to read Tom's blow by blow review, especially if you are really thinking about buying it. I almost did buy it at Borders shortly before Christmas as a gift to myself but divine intervention must have stayed my hand.