 |
Is Paris Burning?
|
DVD Cover Information Actor: Charles Boyer, George Chakiris, Jean-Paul Belmondo, Jean-Pierre Cassel, Leslie Caron Director: René Clément Brand: BELMONDO,JEAN-PAUL Writer: Beate von Molo Writer: Claude Brulé Writer: Dominique Lapierre Writer: Francis Ford Coppola Writer: Gore Vidal Writer: Jean Aurenche Writer: Larry Collins DVD: Region Code 1 Audio: English (Subtitled); English (Original Language), Dolby Digital 2.0 Surround; French (Original Language), Dolby Digital 2.0 Mono; English (Dubbed), Dolby Digital 2.0 Surround Format: Anamorphic, Black & White, Closed-captioned, Dolby, DVD, NTSC, Subtitled, Widescreen Picture Format: 2.35:1 Running Time: 173 minutes DVD Release Date: 2003-06-10 Audience Rating: NR (Not Rated) Studio: Paramount
|
| New | | New Usually ships in 1-2 business days | $42.82 | | | Used | | Used Usually ships in 1-2 business days | $15.95 | |
A-to-z Safe Buying Guarantee Protection
Your purchase is protected by the A-to-z Safe Buying Guarantee.
Amazon.com automatically transfers your payment to the merchant so you'll never
need to pay a merchant directly. Amazon.com A-to-z Safe Buying Guarantee covers both
the delivery of your item and its condition upon receipt.
Movie Reviews of Is Paris Burning?Movie Review: A Farce of a Film. Summary: 2 Stars
Viewed: 3/08
Rate: 3
3/08: Don't be fooled by the caption, sported by Is Paris Burning?, claiming it having an "all-star cast." It is nowhere near the all-star status, not even by a mile. Is Paris Burning? is just a terribly made soap operatic film that runs too long on fumes containing far too many newsreels more than necessary. There are many overly melodramatic scenes constructed to draw sympathy from the audience, and they all come off being amateurishly thought of. Take one scene in particular involving a woman running and looking for her husband (I think) and finally finding him before he runs away and gets shot. Now, when I think about the scene as time goes on, the sillier is the usage of it. In a sense, Is Paris Burning? feels lot like an assembly of many moments into one big picture, almost never tying up together. Every time the word "Paris" is mentioned especially in the last hour of the film, it's like a magic word that can unlock the doors to the universe of truth. And how painfully corny is that? Even worse is the inclusion of Anthony Perkins. I was thinking of Norman Bates Attacks Paris and then Norman Bates Meets a Nazi or Norman Bates Could Have Met Adolf Hitler. In the end, he was pretty much useless as the screen time involving him didn't contribute much to the overall story. Although I do like the concept behind the movie, the movie is so darned predictable, so I feel like I wished the Nazis have blown Paris into smithereens every time the word "Paris" is uttered. Speaking of the "all-star" cast, Orson Welles overacts, Kirk Douglas gives his two cents and disappears after five minutes, and who else...oh yes...the star of Diabolique Simone Signoret shows up and that's it. Rene Clement, the director, shows that he is wholly incapable of directing an epic picture like Is Paris Burning? I am not even sure if I should go as far as calling the movie an epic picture, but it was far too long and silly. When I saw the men being shot without even being actually shot, The Battle of the Bulge immediately came to my mind. Especially a couple of scenes, one of them shows a jeep with several men on it ramming into a wall or a tree, they all stand up and slowly fall to the ground pathetically as if they died at the point of impact. I couldn't help but rewind that part and see it again before laughing too much. On a positive side about Is Paris Burning?, I liked some of the shots and how they were aesthetically done, and it's even probable that certain ideas from the movie were influences for Steven Spielberg before he did Schindler's List. Then again, he might have learned a lot of lessons in what to avoid. When the hammy line "In Paris we have to look our best," was uttered by the French commander, it was the death knell of the film as whole trying to be a serious war film. Anthony Perkins was probably the final nail on the coffin. My gosh, he doesn't even look like he was in a war for mere two seconds! I have to say there are a lot of editing problems throughout Is Paris Burning? because the transitions seemed to be rough and unconnected. When I found that Kirk Douglas was actually playing as General Patton, I was thinking, "Gee whiz." I actually lip-read the actors and found myself questioning if they were speaking in different languages instead of English. Maybe the movie is half-English and half-dubbed. All in all, I just wished that Paris burnt down instead of the mess I saw in Is Paris Burning? As a side mention, I actually liked Gert Frobe, who played the Nazi commander of Paris and did look familiar, in this film.
|
 |