Guns, Germs, and Steel
|
List Price: Our Price: $25.52 You Save: $9.43 (27%) Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days Buy Used: from $19.99 (click here) Category: DVD See more DVD releases |
|---|
Buy this DVD movie at online store in your country
Canada
Canada
Movie Reviews of Guns, Germs, and Steel
Movie Review: Jared Diamond is the Best!!!
Summary: 5 Stars
National Geographic put together and excellant documentary based on Jared Diamonds book. It was well worth the purchase and I would also recommend the book!Movie Review: Its great
Summary: 5 Stars
great!!!!it goes deep into the origins of unequality. i loved. History based, a new perspective to a disturbing question.Movie Review: Guns germs and Steel
Summary: 5 Stars
Excellent, inspiring, energetic explanation of how historical milestones are linked together-- history becomes poetic!Movie Review: Eye-opening Video Series
Summary: 5 Stars
I found Diamond's theory very enlightening and I highly recommend watching this video and/or reading his book.Movie Review: Man on a mission.
Summary: 4 Stars
The documentary Guns, Germs, and Steel is a look at the reasons why different cultures have acquired vastly different amounts of the world's wealth. Professor Jared Diamond looks at this issue of the haves and have-nots through the lens of a theory he has proposed; this theory holds that accidents of geographical location and the availability of useful plants and animals, rather than any intrinsic differences in intellectual ability, are the factors which explain the inequalities. Having an abundant and nutritious food supply gave certain peoples the leisure time to develop industrial arts such as steel-making, which led in turn to an even greater advantage. Close association with domestic animals provided another advantage of which the owners weren't even aware - an immunity to many diseases which they carried to unprotected peoples they invaded. Professor Diamond recognizes no other factors, such as being cleverer or more inventive, in his account of why Europeans gained such a disproportionate share of the world's wealth. The emphasis in this documentary, then, is to debunk the idea that European settlers gained the upper hand through initiative, bravery, or intelligence, for according to his theory, all races contain these qualities in equal amounts. This idea that there is no difference in abilities among various peoples is presented as axiomatic, a first principle on which the rest of his theory is constructed. To illustrate his theory, the documentary goes on location to show the differences geographic and climatic factors have made in cultures. By means of re-enactments of incursions by Europeans, Professor Diamond tries to show how factors other than racial differences account for the success of these incursions. When the Europeans went into lands such as central Africa, which were different from those that had fostered their growth, their efforts at colonization floundered. But due to their established technological abilities, they were still able to plunder the wealth of the land through the subjugation and forced labor of the natives. I looked up Professor Diamond's credentials on several websites, and it is evident that he is not one to be taken lightly. An accomplished linguist, an evolutionary biologist, a geographer, an environmentalist, he has won many awards and recognitions from the academic world and authored several books. The primary implication of his thesis is that less technologically and economically advanced peoples are not to be held responsible for their lack of success, nor are the successful ones to be commended for theirs. This is no doubt true to a great extent, but I wonder if there is not some ideological activism inserted into this presentation. After all, if some peoples had acquired genetic mutations which facilitated the workings of their brain in such a manner to give them an advantage, this would still be no basis for concluding that such people had earned this advantage, or that they were entitled to more of the world's wealth. Evolution, from the information I have gleaned from books on the subject, has effectively been an opportunistic and amoral process conferring adaptive advantages not to the deserving but to the strategically placed. Even within the same cultures there is always a wide divergence of capability, so why should there not be a divergence of overall ability between cultures? This divergence of ability would not imply any absolute quality of superiority. Even if, though contrary to Professor Diamond's theory, Europeans had more innate technological ability, the idea that they were more deserving could(and should) still be held up to scorn. Perhaps Professor Diamond is partly right, mostly right, or completely right. I'm not qualified and don't have the evidence at hand to say. But I think legitimate questions could be raised to challenge his central concept, and if solutions to the problem of unequal wealth are proposed, they should be based on objective analysis and not ideology. Whether you find yourself agreeing with or doubting Professor Diamond's theory, you will be prompted to think about the issue, and that has merit in itself. There is an unfortunate amount of repetition in the documentary, largely due to the carryover between the three episodes.