Bad Company
|
List Price: Our Price: $3.85 You Save: $11.10 (74%) Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days Buy Used: from $0.01 (click here) Category: DVD See more DVD releases |
|---|
Canada
Movie Reviews of Bad Company
Movie Review: Bad Company
Summary: 4 Stars
I really liked this movie even though most reviews I've read give this movie an average rating, it deserves an above average rating. Chris Rock isn't as raw in his comedy as he is today however, it is a Disney made movie because Touchstone is owned by Disney so anytime you see Touchstone the movie will more than likely be more conservative. The movie was really entertaining especially being a huge fan of Anthony Hopkins and Chris Rock. Who would think to put the combination of stars (Anthony and Chris) together and have it work so well together. Plus both of the actors were believable. It's definitly worth watching and I'm going to buy this one on DVD.Movie Review: Truly Surprised
Summary: 4 Stars
I remember when this movie came out in theaters. I saw the previews on TV, but was not driven to go out to see it. I just thought that Hopkins/Rock was a wierd mixture that couldn't possibly create a good movie. I was wrong. I saw the DVD on sale and picked it up, as I was interested in seeing how it actually was. I was truly surprised at how good the movie was. Of course, since it has Chris Rock in it, it has some good laughs, but in general, it's a well constructed espionage flick that's well worth seeing.Movie Review: Better Then I Expected
Summary: 4 Stars
Ok I didn't have the highest of expectations but it was an entertaining film. You've got to admit no one expected Anthony Hopkins and Chris Rock to ever team up in a movie. Without them this movie would have been a complete flop. The plot was fairly predictable but it didn't keep the jokes and action scenes from being entertaining.Movie Review: Better than expected
Summary: 3 Stars
After hearing a lot of negative comments on this movie I really expected the worst. Perhaps that is why it is a lot better then expected.
First of all there is the director and producer: Jerry Bruckheimer, you either lover or hate his productions. He is probably the world's most famous producer and many of his productions arevery recognisable, this is one of these typical Bruckheimer productions. But where most of these typically well known Bruckheimer action-movies are are directed by Michael Bay this one was done by Joel Schumacher. Schumacher nowadays finally is slowly getting recognision for his work, however in the days this movie was made he still sufferend from the negative opinion on his Batman attempts. It is widely agreed that the first two Batmans were batter than the latter two. That can indeed be blamed on Schumacher, but it was not his own choice to make his versions of Batman less dark and Gothic than the first two, it was the choice of the people he worked for(WB&Producers). Bad Company movie was not good enough to really improve his status, but it did the job and was good enough to keep him more than accepted in the industry.
The actors: Anthony Hopkins plays a role that seems a sort of crossing between the characters he played in 'The mask of Zorro' and 'Mission Impossible 2' but with a bit more fysical action. He does not have to use a lot of his qualities as an actor, and it can hardly be denied that some of his qualities are wasted in this movies, but we see some chemistry with Chris Rock(but that is also result of his quality as an actor), and even although this movie may not demand all of Hopkins' qualities, we don't have to be sorry for him. He has made clear in interviews that he can find himself at home in a movie like this, and that he has a very down to earth idea about the acting profession.
Chris Rock acts pretty decently. He is a respectable komedian but at best an average actor. I must admit some moments are almost ashaming, but others are pretty good. He seems a bit out of place in the whole picture, that tries to be realistic an serious, while Chris Rock can only really shine in a good comedy setting. It almost seems like they got him into the project thinking he could become a sort of second Will Smith or even Eddie Murphy, although with his very own character. Unfortunately his acting is not always up to par, at least it goes not go very well with the vision of the director and this is one of the main reasons why the movie does not really know where it wants to go, and goes a little bit in every direction, but nowhere in particular.
This is the biggest problem of this movie, it seems like the product of conflicting visions. It has no definition or direction where it wants to go. It tries to do a little (buddy)comedy, it tries to be a sort of stylish action movie (some of the shots and locations are among the best in action movies in the last few years. These two directions create a bit of conflict in many movies, but here this tension is really of bad influence, it can't become humoristic enough nor stylish enough to really work. So it can't stick out enough in the masses of action movies.
The second problem is that there are a lot of Clichees in this movie. The way the characters are introduced. It really seems the story relies on formulas to quickly recall instantly recognisable concepts of characters. This way the characters remain a bit opf cardboard characters or puppets. It is just impossible to create truely interesting character development if the character is made by stereotypes and formulas.
The editing is not always very good. The action sequences are often very well done... wel paced, nice use of cinematography etc. But the other parts don't alway have the right pace timing and style.
Even although this movie has some big problems it is still a decent action movie that is worth watching. The action sequenses are good with clear cinematography, perhaps a bit slow for some, but imho that made it only better. It is a Bruckheimer film, so that is what you should expect. If you want to see a perfect exaample of an action thriller that is a reference still today try" the day of the jackal(1973)" ,or if you really want something modern and are not into Bruckheimer yet "Enemy of the state" is the better choise. But if you want to see a movie that is generally entertaining, knows what Bruckheimer stands for and don't mind that the good (action) moments that are there in the movie are intervened by a lot of average and some bad ones it is surely worth the try. You will be surprised by some (hidden) qualities it offers. My advice is really to watch (rent) it before you buy it. It is definately worth watching once but I can't guarantee you like it.
Movie Review: Better than I anticipated
Summary: 3 Stars
From the reviews I heard, and read, I was expecting Bad Company to be a horrible movie. This movie was actually not bad. Granted there were some far fetched issues, like Anthony Hopkins running up flights of stairs in no time, but too me this movie was a good action comedy. Chris Rock plays Mike Turner/Jacob Hayes. As Jacob Hayes, he is a bookie/DJ/hustler who is coming to terms with his ending relationship with Julia who after three years is moving to Seattle to move on with her life. Jacob is brought into the CIA to help finish a case his now murdered brother Mike Turner was working on. Agent Oaks has 9 days to make Jacob as polished and knowledge as Hayes to make the mission a success. Jacob is to help twart a possible suitcase bomb from getting into the wrong hands. As Mike Hayes he has to speak well, and well act like his brother without blowing the whole case. Turns out he can mix his street smarts and get over. He can't fool everybody though. When Nicole (played by Garcelle Beauvais) she knows right off he is not Mike. Jacob has to dodge bullets, and is ready to leave the case all together until His girlfriend Juila is kidnapped by the bad guys.
The movie had some great action scenes. Some of the comedic lines were out of place, but the comedic lines that did fit well in the film were funny. The scene where puts Air supply son "All out of Love" on in a club was very, very funny. Those folks in the club looked like they were about to jump him!!! Kerry Washington has a bright future if she keeps getting some good roles. Irma P Hall has a role in the film as Jacob foster mother. Michael Early also had a very small minor role, so small and minor there was really no sense in him being in the film. The same with Garcelle Beauvais her role was so minor I wondered if it was really necessary. Aside of that I really enjoyed this film, the movie is predictable at time, but interesting enough to keep you watching. I would actually rent this again.
If you enjoyed Rush Hour, or Enemy of the State then you should enjoy this movie.